Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV and five-factor models.
Author | |
---|---|
Abstract |
:
Clinical utility, or the usefulness of a diagnostic system in clinical practice, has been identified as an important construct in proposed revisions to the diagnostic nomenclature and a significant limitation of dimensional models of personality disorder, such as the 5-factor model (FFM). Only 1 study to date has addressed explicitly the clinical utility of the FFM, and the findings suggested significant limitations. In the current study, 245 practicing psychologists described 3 historic cases using both the FFM and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and then rated each model on 6 aspects of clinical utility. In contrast to prior research, the psychologists in this study considered the FFM to have greater clinical utility than the existing diagnostic categories. |
Year of Publication |
:
2006
|
Journal |
:
Journal of abnormal psychology
|
Volume |
:
115
|
Issue |
:
2
|
Number of Pages |
:
298-308
|
ISSN Number |
:
0021-843X
|
URL |
:
http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/115/2/298
|
DOI |
:
10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.298
|
Short Title |
:
J Abnorm Psychol
|
Download citation |